WebJun 6, 2006 · One of my all time legal favorite passages is from Hilen v. Hays, 673 S.W.2d 713 (Ky. 1984), which Justice Charles Leibson wrote, demonstrating how the court could and should change our contributory . I was inspired reading Barbara Glesner Fine’s post on the Law Prof Blog, where she reports on a law professors’ conference. “Professor ... WebNov 25, 2009 · Hilen v. Hays, 673 S.W.2d 713, 717 (Ky.1984); Gilbert v. Barkes, 987 S.W.2d 772 (Ky.1999). Although Saleba contends that this Court's refusal to protect peer review documents in medical malpractice cases frustrates the purpose of the privilege and undermines the greater goal of improving healthcare, Saleba has not presented …
The Future of Kentucky
WebJul 1, 2011 · Hays, 673 S.W.2d 713 (Ky.1984). Fifth, she claims there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the dimensions of the threshold violated the Kentucky Building Code. Finally, she claims that the trial court granted summary judgment prematurely because discovery was incomplete. WebSee, e.g., Hilen v. Hays, 673 S.W.2d 713, 717 (Ky. 1984) ("A list of the critics of contributory negligence as a complete bar to a plaintiff's recovery reads like a tort hall of fam ... Hilen v. Hays, Ky., 673 S.W.2d 713, 715 (1984) ("This provision [Kentucky Constitution, Section 233] had the effect of adopting as the law of this state ... ipswich queensland weather today
Justice Donald C. Wintersheimer Digital Collection
WebMar 14, 2024 · Hilen v. Hays, 673 S.W.2d 713, 717 (Ky. 1984). While changing or extending current precedent should be done with the utmost discretion and deliberation, it is an important aspect of our Anglo-American legal system that, … WebHays, 673 S.W.2d 713 (1984). In 1998, he appeared on the PBS television special "Inside the Law" with Jack Ford and Barry Scheck. He and his wife Alice, a teacher, reside in … WebJul 5, 1984 · 673 S.W.2d 713 (1984) Margie Montgomery HILEN, Appellant, v. Keith HAYS, Appellee. Supreme Court of Kentucky. July 5, 1984. Attorney (s) appearing for the Case William R. Garmer, Perlman & Garmer, PSC, Lexington, for appellant. C. William Swinford, Stoll, Keenon & Park, Lexington, for appellee. orchard olathe co